本·法因,阿尔弗雷多·萨德-费洛,田磊

• 1:伦敦大学亚非学院
• 2:清华大学马克思主义学院

摘要(Abstract)：

马克思主义政治经济学在今天仍然拥有生命力和解释力,并不仅仅是因为每当资本主义面临危机时,人们都习惯性地转向马克思来寻求解决方法。在《资本论》以及在马克思主义的不断演进过程中,马克思主义政治经济学展现出富有价值的洞察力,以此既可以阐明社会再生产和经济再生产的运行机制,也可以分析经济领域和非经济领域(的不同方面)之间的关系。通过马克思主义内部的讨论、马克思主义理论与其他政治经济学分支之间的交流甚至马克思主义理论对其反对者所造成的影响,都能感受到马克思主义的存在。马克思主义政治经济学想要获得持续的解释力,关键就在于通过马克思主义提供理论框架,将研究和批判资本主义矛盾的诸多没有交集的社会科学理论统一起来。构造这种统一所需要的要素正是马克思的劳动价值论,不仅这一理论的潜力通过斯拉法的批评经受了检验,而且它通过马克思主义政治经济学的两个核心概念——劳动力价值和金融化——得以阐明。我们可以从商品化、商品形式和商品计算等过程的角度对这两个概念进行探究。

关键词(KeyWords)： 马克思劳动价值论;劳动力价值;金融化;商品;商品形式;商品计算

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 本·法因,阿尔弗雷多·萨德-费洛,田磊

参考文献(References)：

• [1]Brennan,D.M.,D.Kristjanson-Gural,C.P.Mulder,and E.K.Olsen(eds.),Handbook of Marxian Economics(London:Routledge,2017).
• [2]Christophers,B.，“The Limits to Financialization，”Dialogues in Human Geography,2015,5(2):183-200.
• [3]Christophers,B.，“Seeing Financialization?-Stylized Facts and the Economy Multiple，”Journal of Physical,Human,and Regional Geosciences,2017,85(October):259-268.
• [4]Dymski,G.，“How to Engage with the Global Crisis:The Shape of Jazz to Come，”International Initiative for Promoting Political Economy,http://iippe.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Dymski-IIPPE-keynote-as-presented.pdf,2015.
• [5]Epstein,G.A.,Financialization and the World Economy(Aldershot:Edward Elgar,2005).
• [6]Fine,B.,Economic Theory and Ideology(London:Edward Arnold,1980).
• [7]Fine,B.(ed.),The Value Dimension,Marx versus Ricardo and Sraffa(London:Routledge and Kegan Paul,1986).
• [8]Fine,B.，“Intervention Debating Lebowitz:Is Class Conflict the Moral and Historical Element in the Value of Labour-Power?”Historical Materialism,2008,16(3):105-114.
• [9]Fine,B.，“Locating Financialisation，”Historical Materialism,2010,18(2):97-116.
• [10]Fine,B.，“Neoliberalism in Retrospect?-It's Financialisation,Stupid，”in Chang,K.-S.,B.Fine,and L.Weiss(eds.),Developmental Politics in Transition:The Neoliberal Era and Beyond(London:Palgrave,2012a).
• [11]Fine,B.，“Financialisation and Social Policy，”in Utting,P.,S.Razavi,and R.Buchholz(eds.),Global Crisis and Transformative Social Change(London:Palgrave,2012b).
• [12]Fine,B.，“Revisiting Rosa Luxemburg's Political Economy，”Critique 2012c,40(3):449-456.
• [13]Fine,B.,Labour Market Theory:A Constructive Reassessment(London:Routledge,original1998,2013a).
• [14]Fine,B.，“Consumption Matters，”Ephemera,2013b,13(2):217-248.
• [15]Fine,B.，“Financialization from a Marxist Perspective，”International Journal of Political Economy,2014a,42(4):47-66.
• [16]Fine,B.，“The Continuing Enigmas of Social Policy，”Prepared for the UNRISD project on Towards Universal Social Security in Emerging Economies,UNRISD Working Paper 2014b 10.
• [17]Fine,B.，“The Endemic and Systemic Malaise of Mainstream Economics，”FESSUD Working Paper Series No.190,http://fessud.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/FESSUD_WP190_The-Endemic Systemic-Malaise-of-Mainstream-Economics.pdf,2015.
• [18]Fine,B.，“The Material and Culture of Financialisation，”New Political Economy,2017a,22(4):371-382.
• [19]Fine,B.，“A Note towards an Approach Towards Social Reproduction，”International Initiative for Promoting Political Economy,29 December 2017b,http://iippe.org/wp/wpcontent/uploads/2017/01/sroverviewben.pdf.
• [20]Fine,B.，“The Continuing Enigmas of Social Policy，”in Ye,I.(ed.),Towards Universal Health Care in Emerging Economies:Opportunities and Challenges(London:Palgrave,2017c).
• [21]Fine,B.，“Neither Equilibrium as Such nor as Abstraction:Debating Fred Moseley's Transformation，”International Journal of Political Economy,2017d,46(1):22-28.
• [22]Fine,B.,K.Bayliss,M.Robertson,and A.Saad-Filho,Neoliberalism,Financialisation and Welfare:The Political Economy of Social Provision in the UK(Aldershot:Edward Elgar,2018)．
• [23]Fine,B.,and D.Hall，“Terrains of Neoliberalism:Constraints and Opportunities for Alternative Models of Service Delivery，”in McDonald,D.and G.Ruiters(eds.),Alternatives to Privatization:Exploring Noncommercial Service Delivery Options in the Global South(London:Routledge,2012).
• [24]Fine,B.,and L.Harris,Rereading“Capital”(London:Macmillan,1979).
• [25]Fine,B.,and A.Saad-Filho(eds.),The Elgar Companion to Marxist Economics(Aldershot:Edward Elgar,2013).
• [26]Fine,B.,and A.Saad-Filho,Marx's“Capital”,6th ed.(London:Pluto Press,2016).
• [27]Fine,B.,and A.Saad-Filho，“Thirteen Things You Need to Know about Neoliberalism，”Critical Sociology,2017,43(4-5):685-706.
• [28]Howard,M.C.,and J.King,A History of Marxian Economics,Vol.1(Princeton:Princeton University Press,1989).
• [29]Howard,M.C.,and J.King,A History of Marxian Economics,Vol.2(Princeton:Princeton University Press,1991).
• [30]Lebowitz,M.，“The Politics of Assumption,the Assumption of Politics，”Historical Materialism,2006,14(2):29-47.
• [31]Lebowitz,M.，“Trapped inside the Box?-Five Questions for Ben Fine，”Historical Materialism,2010,18(1):131-149.
• [32]Michell,J.,and J.Toporowski，“Critical Observations on Financialization and the Financial Process，”International Journal of Political Economy,2013,42(4):67-82.
• [33]Moseley,F.,Money and Totality(Leiden:Brill,2015).
• [34]Radin,M.,Contested Commodities(Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1996).
• [35]Saad-Filho,A.,The Value of Marx(London:Routledge,2002).
• [36]Saad-Filho,A.，“Neoliberalism，”in Brennan,D.M.,D.Kristjanson-Gural,C.Mulder,and E.Olsen(eds.),The Handbook of Marxian Economics(London:Routledge,2017).
• [37]Samuelson,P.A.，“A Summing Up，”The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1966,80(4):568-583.
• [38]Samuelson,P.M.，“Understanding the Marxian Notion of Exploitation,A Summary of the SoCalled Transformation Problem between Marxian Values and Competitive Prices，”Journal of Economic Literature,1971,9(2):399-431.
• [39]Shaikh,A.,Capitalism:Competition,Conflict,Crises(Oxford:Oxford University Press,2016)．
• [40]Sweezy,P.,The Theory of Capitalist Development(New York:Monthly Review Press,1968).
• [41]Steedman,I.,Marx after Sraffa(London:New Left Books,1977).
• [42]Steedman,I.(ed.),The Value Controversy(London:Verso,1981).
• [43]Zelizer,V.,Pricing the Invaluable Child:The Changing Social Value of Children(Ithaca:Princeton University Press,1994).
• (1)重要的是，近来类似的研究十分稀少，主要是因为马克思主义政治经济学已经变得碎片化，分散于不同的位置和主题。
• (2)最新研究请见Moseley(2015)和Shaikh(2016)。
• (1)译者注:这里的斯拉法主义具体指斯蒂德曼等人的理论，实际上与斯拉法本人的观点并不相同。