国外转形问题研究若干评论Some Comments on Abroad Study of Transformation Problem
荣兆梓,陈旸
摘要(Abstract)：
20世纪80年代,弗里和杜梅尼尔等人提出劳动价值论“新解释”。近40年来,国外马克思主义的转形问题研究沿着“新解释”路径推进,产生了一些新观点、新流派。克莱曼和麦克高伦等人的“跨期单一体系”和莫斯里的“宏观货币解释”都是这一理论动向的产物。可惜此类研究大多沿着“新解释”混淆价格与生产价格的错误方向推进,对问题的解决并没有太多贡献。本文从C体系的视角出发回顾近期国外转形问题研究的若干成果。
关键词(KeyWords)： 跨期单一体系;宏观货币解释;C体系;总剩余价值率
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 荣兆梓,陈旸
参考文献(References)：
- 丁堡骏.2005.马克思劳动价值理论与当代现实[M].北京:经济科学出版社.DING B J.2005.Marx's labour theory of value and contemporary reality[M].Beijing:Economic Science Press.(in Chinese)
- 马克思.2004a.资本论(第一卷)[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,译.北京:人民出版社.
- 马克思.2004b.资本论(第二卷)[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,译.北京:人民出版社.
- 马克思.2004c.资本论(第三卷)[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,译.北京:人民出版社.
- 马克思,恩格斯.1995.马克思恩格斯全集(第30卷)[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,译.北京:人民出版社.
- 莫斯里F.2019.货币与总体性:一个对马克思《资本论》逻辑的宏观-货币解释以及“转形问题”的终结[J].孙小雨,译.政治经济学报,(15):120-140.(原书:MOSELEY F.[2016].Money and totality:A macro-monetary interpretation of Marx's logic in Capital and the end of the“transformation problem”[J].International Journal of Political Economy,46(1):2-21.)
- 荣兆梓,李帮喜,陈旸.2016.马克思主义广义转形理论及模型新探[J].马克思主义研究,(2):66-78.RONG Z Z,LI B X,CHEN Y.2016.A new approach to Marx's general transformation theory and model[J].Studies on Marxism,(2):66-78.(in Chinese)
- 斯蒂德曼I.1991.按照斯拉法思想研究马克思[M].吴剑敏,史晋川,译.北京:商务印书馆.(原书:STEEDMAN I.[1977].Marx after Sraffa[M].London:New Left Books.)
- 严金强,马艳.2011.价值转形理论研究[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社.YAN J Q,MA Y.2011.Study on the value transformation[M].Shanghai:Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Press.(in Chinese)
- 张忠任.2001.转形问题的最终解决[J].数量经济技术经济研究,(2):91-94.ZHANG Z R.2001.The final solution of the transformation problem[J].The Journal of Quantitative&Technical Economics,(2):91-94.(in Chinese)
- 张忠任.2004.百年难题的破解---价值向生产价格转形问题的历史与硏究[M].北京:人民出版社.ZHANG Z R.2004.A solution to the 100-year-old puzzle[M].Beijing:People's Publishing House.(in Chinese)
- DUMéNIL G.1983.Beyond the transformation riddle:A labor theory of value[J].Science and Society,47(4):427-450.
- FOLEY D.1982.The Value of money the balue of labor power and the Marxian transformation problem[J].Review of Radical Political Economics,14(2):37-47.
- FUJIMORI Y.1985.On a recent discussion of the transformation problem[J].Josai Journal of Economics,21(2/3):443-451.
- HUANG K,LIANG J S.2021.Chinese studies on the transformation problem:Aselective review[J].Review of Radical Political Economics,53(4):725-734.
- KLIMAN A,MCGLONE T.1988.The transformation non-problem and the nontransformation problem[J].Capital&Class,12(2):56-84.
- LAIBMAN D.1973.Values and prices of production:The political economy of the transformation problem[J].Science&Society,37(4):404-36.
- LIPIETZ A.1982.The so-called“transformation problem”revisited[J].Journal of Economic Theory,26(1):59-68.
- MONTES-ROJAS G.2022.A typology of Marxian transformation procedures with endogenous exploitation rate[J/OL].Metroeconomica:online first.https://doi.org/10.1111/meca.12406.
- MOSELEY F.2012.The macro-monetary interpretation of Marx's transformation problem and a sympathetic critique of the‘new interpretation’[R/OL].Working Paper,https://www.mtholyoke.edu/~fmoseley/Working_Papers_PDF/macro-monetary.pdf.
- MOSELEY F.2016.Money and totality:A macro-monetary interpretation of Marx's logic in Capital and the end of the“transformation problem”[M].Leiden:Brill Publishers.
- SAMUELSON P A.1970.The“transformation”from Marxian“values”to competitive“prices”:A process of rejection and replacement[J].Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences,67(1):423-425.
- SETON,F.1957.The“transformation problem”[J].Review of Economic Studies,24(3):149-160.
- Von BORTKIEWICZ L.1952.Value and price in the Marxian system[J].International Economic Papers,(2):5-60.
- Von BORTKIEWICZ L.1984.On the correction of Marx's fundamental theoretical construction in the third volume of Capital[M]//SWEEZY P M.Karl Marx and the close of his system/Boehm-Bawerk's criticism of Marx.New York:Kelley:199-221.
- (1)有些评论者因为TSS表面上维护马克思的观点而给他较高评价。这种只“听其言”而不“观其行”的学术评论是不负责任的。
- (1)“我们假定,劳动剥削程度,从而剩余价值率和工作日长度,在一个国家的社会劳动所分成的一切生产部门都一样大,一样高”(马克思. 2004c,p. 159)。
- (2)“在第一篇和第二篇,我们考察的,始终只是单个资本,只是社会资本中一个独立部分的运动。”(马克思,2004b,p. 392)
- (1)滕森较早地讨论了这种分类组合(Fujimori,1985)。